MARCH 2017 BAD FAITH CASES: BAD FAITH LAW NOT APPLICABLE TO CONDUCT RELATING TO SALE OF AN INSURANCE POLICY (Philadelphia Federal)

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In this case, the court observed the distinction between applicable legal theories addressing conduct before and after an insurance policy is issued. The court observed that pre-sale conduct, if actionable, is subject to Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, not its Bad Faith Statute.

Date of Decision: March 7, 2017

Romero v. Allstate, No. 16-4037, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31965 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 7, 2017) (Schmehl, J.)

0 Responses to “MARCH 2017 BAD FAITH CASES: BAD FAITH LAW NOT APPLICABLE TO CONDUCT RELATING TO SALE OF AN INSURANCE POLICY (Philadelphia Federal)”


Comments are currently closed.